SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
GYANENDRA SAHOO@ BABU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['SMRUTI RANJAN MOHAPATRA', '', 'B R MOHANTY', 'M K SWAIN', 'D R MOHANTY', 'M/S ASHOK KUMAR BEHERA', 'M B SMRUTIRANJAN', 'SREYA SATPATHY']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

BLAPL No. 7147 of 2020

Gyanendra Sahoo @

Babu

….

Petitioner

Mr. S.R. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

State of Odisha

….

Opp. Party

Mr. J.P. Patra, Addl. Standing Counsel

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO

Order No.

ORDER

05.04.2021

05.

1.

This matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

counsel for the State.

3.

Learned counsel for the State submits that the notice

on the informant is sufficient.

4.

None appears on behalf of the informant.

5.

This is an application under section 439 of Cr.P.C. in

connection with C.T. Case No.1260 of 2020 arising out of

Jajpur P.S. Case No.263 of 2020 pending in the Court of

learned S.D.J.M., Jajpur for offences punishable under sections

448/376/384/292-A/506/109/34 of the Indian Penal Code and

sections 67/67Aof the Information Technology Act.

// 2 //

Page 2 of 2

6.

The petitioner moved an application for bail before the

Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top