SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KUNA RAMANJANEYULU – Appellant
Versus
C.R.MARANDI – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S KALI PRASANNA MISHRA', 'S MOHAPATRA', 'T P TRIPATHY', 'L P DWIVEDY', 'M/S A K DAS', 'R B MISHRA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CONTC No.1886 of 2019

Kuna Ramanjaneyulu

….

Petitioner

Ms. S. Mohapatra, Advocate

-versus-

C.R. Marandi and Others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. A. K. Das, counsel

for Opposite Parties.

CORAM:

THE CHIEF JUSTICE

JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY

ORDER

Order No.

22.04.2021

06.

1. The matter is taken up by video conferencing mode.

2. The contemptuous action alleged in the present petition is the

violation of an order dated 7th March 2018 passed in W.P(C)

No.985 of 2018 (Misc. Case No.690 of 2018) by the present

Opposite Party Nos. 1 to 4 who are the Railway authorities.

3.

The Petitioner is a sub-inspector in the Railway Protection

Force (RPF). He had filed the aforementioned writ petition

challenging the continuation of a departmental proceeding

against him as void ab inito, illegal and unsustainable in the eye

of law along with certain other prayers. This Court on 7th March

2018 passed the following order in the said petition:

“Sri D. K. Sahu, learned counsel has accepted notice for

al

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top