SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUBHASMITA MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S SUJATA JENA', '', 'G B JENA', 'B JENA']

2 13.12.2018

Heard Mrs. S. Jena, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Mr. B. Senapati, learned Additional

Government Advocate .

The petitioner has filed the writ petition to quash

the advertisement No.1247 dated 03.12.2018 issued

by opposite party no.3-CDPO, Tangi Choudwar,

Cuttack for engagement of Anganwadi Worker in

respect of Tenament Colony Anganwadi Centre.

Mrs. S. Jena, learned counsel for the petitioner

contended that the petitioner has preferred appeal

bearing Anganwadi Appeal No.8 of 2018 before the

Additional District Magistrate, Cuttack which is

pending for consideration. When the matter is

subjudiced before the learned Additional District

Magistrate and the matter is posted to 08.01.2019 for

hearing, the CDPO, Tangi Choudwar, Cuttack has

issued advertisement for filling up the vacancy of

Anganwadi Worker in respect of Tenament Colony

Anganwadi Centre. She further contended that when

the

matter

is

subjudiced

before

the

appellate

authority, issuance of fresh advertisement by the

CDPO, Tangi Choudwar causes prejudice to the

petitioner. Therefore, the petitioner has approached

this Court by filing the writ petition

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top