ORISSA HIGH COURT
D.DASH, J
GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
08. 01.03.2019
The
petitioner
by
filing
this
application
has
impeached an order dated 27.07.2017 passed by the
learned
Assistant
Sessions
Judge-cum-Special
Track
Court, Bhadrak in S.T. Case No. 74/313 of 2016. By the
said order, the learned court below has rejected the
petition filed by the petitioner for his discharge.
It is seen that the petitioner for that discharge has
raised two grounds. First one is that the written complaint
lodged by the petitioner in relation to incident wherein the
members of the prosecution party were the assailants has
not been properly investigated and that final report having
been submitted as false, the matter being pending before
this Court in CRLMP No. 26 of 2017, the framing of charge
in the case is not permissible. The second ground is that
the injury on the person of the injured having been found
to be simple in nature, no prima facie case under section
307 of the IPC is made out.
Learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel
appearing for the opposite party no. 2 submit that even if a
counter case runs for the incident, it has no such legal
impact on the order of framing of charge in the ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.