SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRIYANKA BEHERA – Appellant
Versus
AJIT BEHERA – Respondent
TRP(C) 334/2022



Advocates:
['JANMEJAYA DASH', '', 'G K NAYAK', 'M/S ACHYUTANANDA PATTNAIK', 'JAYADEBA BEHERA']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

TRP(C) No.334 of 2022

Priyanka Behera

&.

Petitioner

-versus-

Ajit Behera

&.

Opposite Party

CORAM:

JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY

Order No

ORDER

02.12.2022

04.

1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical) Mode.

2. Pursuant to the order passed by this Court on 17.11.2022 the

Opp. Party along with his counsel and learned counsel for the

Petitioner are present before this Court.

3. Mr. G.K. Nayak, learned counsel for the Petitioner at the outset

submitted that since in the meantime and during pendency of the

matter, Opp. Party has got married for the second time, the

Petitioner is not ready and willing for any settlement and

accordingly did not think it proper to appear before this Court.

4. Mr. A. Pattnaik, learned counsel for the Opp. Party as well as the

Opp. Party, who is present in Person before this Court did not

dispute the submission regarding marriage of the Opp. Party for the

second time.

5. It is further contended by the learned counsel for the Petitioner

that since the Opp. Party has got married for the second time the

prayer of the Petitioner for transfer of the matter in C.P. No. 382 of

// 2 //

Page 2 of 2

2021 filed by the Opp. Party before the learned Judge, Family

Court, Bhubaneswar be transferred to the Court of learned Judge,

Family Court at Jeypore in the district of Koraput.

6. To the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the

Petitioner, learned counsel for the Opp. Party submitted that since

the Opp. Party is now residing at Bhubaneswar and earning his

livelihood by working as a Daily Wager, he will face difficulty in

appearing the Court at Jeypore. It is further contended that if the

matter in question will be transferred to the Court of learned Judge,

Family Court at Rayagada, then the Opp. Party shall appear before

the said Court and participate in the proceeding. Learned counsel

for the Petitioner-wife did not oppose to such prayer made by the

learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Party.

7. Having heard learned counsel for the Parties and taking into

account the submissions made as well as the grounds taken for

transfer of the proceeding in C.P. No. 382 of 2021, this Court

directs learned Family Judge, Bhubaneswar to transfer C.P. No. 382

of 2021 to the Court of learned Judge, Family Court, Rayagada

forthwith on receipt of this order. However, it is observed that the

Opp. Party shall bear the expenses of the Petitioner for her

appearance before the learned Judge, Family Court at Rayagada on

each and every date of her appearance. The cost of such appearance

shall be assessed by the learned Judge Family Court, Rayagada.

8. The transfer petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation

and direction.

(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy)

Judge

Sneha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top