SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
STATE OF ODISHA – Appellant
Versus
MINARVA DASH – Respondent


Advocates:
['SR STANDING COUNSELSandME', '', 'STANDING COUNSEL', 'M/S MILAN KANUNGO', 'SR ADV', '', 'S ROUT', 'S R MOHANTY', 'S K MISHRA']

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA: CUTTACK.

W.P.(C) No.4224 of 2017

In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution

of India.

---------

State of Orissa and others

……

Petitioners

- Versus-

Minarva Dash and others

…… Opposite Parties

For Petitioner

: Sr. Standing Counsel and Standing Counsel for

School and Mass Education Department.

For Opp.Parties

: M/s Milan Kanungo, Sr.Advocate,

S.K.Mishra, S.Rout, S.R.Mohanty

( for O.P.No.1)

---------

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE KUMARI JUSTICE SANJU PANDA

AND

THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE S.N.PRASAD

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of hearing and judgment: 27.4.2017

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

S.N.Prasad,J.

This writ petition is under Articles 226 and 227 of the

Constitution of India whereby and where under the order 1.7.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top