SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
SANJAY KUMAR DAS – Appellant
Versus
MUNMUN PATNAIK – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S PRAFULLA CH BISWAL', '', 'S K BEHURA', 'N PATNAIK']

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK

C.M.P. No.1545 of 2018

In the matter of an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India.

-----------

Sanjay Kumar Das

&. Petitioner

Versus

Munmum Patnaik and others

&. Opposite Parties

For Petitioner

&

Mr. Prafulla Ch. Biswal, Advocate

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.RATH

Date of hearing and judgment : 21.12.2018

Dr. A.K.Rath, J The core question that falls for determination in

this petition is whether a woman, who is a domicile of the State of

Orissa and became US citizen, is exempted from payment of court fee ?

2.

Since the dispute lies in a very narrow compass, facts need

not be recounted in details. Suffice it to say that plaintiff-opposite

party no.1 instituted the suit for declaration of title, partition and

permanent injunction. The suit is valued at Rs.1,11,84,300/- on

which, advolerum court fees of Rs.3,61,931/- is payable. As the

plaintiff is a woman, she is exempted from payment of court fees. After

appearance, defendant no.1 filed an application stating therein that

the plaintiff is a citizen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top