SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, J
SUKANTI BARIK – Appellant
Versus
BEDABYAS BARIK – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR ORISSA

AT CUTTACK

ARBP No. 74 of 2019

(An application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation

Act, 1996).

Smt. Sukanti Barik

Petitioner

-Versus-

Sri Bedabyas Barik

Opp. Party

Advocate(s) who appeared in this case by Video Conferencing mode:-

For Petitioner

:

Mr. Janmejaya Ray

For Opp.Parties

:

Mr. Bibhuti Bhusan Mishra(2)

HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MOHAMMAD RAFIQ

ORDER

13.11.2020

This petition has been filed by Smt. Sukanti Barik,

under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

(for short, "the Act, 1996") seeking appointment of an independent

Arbitrator to arbitrate the disputes between the petitioner and the

opposite parties.

2.

The case of the petitioner as set out in the petition in

brief is that the opposite party took loan of Rs.2,60,53,175/- (two

crore sixty lakhs fifty-three thousand one hundred seventy five

rupees) from the petitioner on 11.10.2014 and in this regard an

agreement under Annexure-1 was executed between the parties.

2

As per clause 6 of the said agreement, any dispute arising ou

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top