SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
BINODINI BHUE – Appellant
Versus
SURESH KUMAR AGRAWAL – Respondent


Advocates:
['NIROD KUMAR SAHU', '', 'S MISHRA', 'O PANDA', 'M/S SIDHARTHA MISHRA', 'J R SAMAL', 'B B MOHAPATRA']

Page 1 of 9

TRP (C) No.381 of 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

TRP (C) NO.381 OF 2022

In the matter of an application under section 24 of the Code of Civil

Procedure.

----

Binodini Bhue & Others

….

Petitioners

-versus-

Suresh Kumar Agarwal & Others

….

Opposite Parties

Appeared in this case by Hybrid Arrangement

(Virtual/Physical Mode):

For Petitioners

-

Mr.Nirod Kumar Sahu

(Advocate)

For Opp. Parties -

Mr.Sidharth Mishra

For O.P.1

CORAM:

JUSTICE D.DASH

Date of Hearing : 10.11.2022 : Date of Judgment:25.11.2022

D.Dash,J. The Petitioners, by filing this application under section 24 of the

Code of Civil Procedure (in short, ‘the Code’), have prayed for transfer

of the suit, i.e., C.S. No.62 of 2009 pending in the Court of the learned

Senior Civil Judge, Bargarh, District-Bargarh to the Court of the learned

Senior Civil Judge, Cuttack in the District of Cuttack.

2.

Facts necessary for the purpose are as under:-

The subject matter of the suit is the land measuring Ac.1.20

decimals under Hal Khata No.2414/1716 comprising of Plot Nos.4445,

{{ 2 }}

Page 2 of 9

TRP (C) No.381 of 2022

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top