SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
S.K.PANIGRAHI, J
SHYAM SUNDAR PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


Page 1 of 2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC(OAPC) No.299 of 2012

Shyam Sundar Patnaik

….

Petitioner

Mr.A.K.Mishra, Adv.

-versus-

State of Odisha & another

….

Opposite Parties

Mr.Y.S.P. Babu, AGA

CORAM:

MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI

Order No.

ORDER

18.02.2022

02

1.This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the

in-action of the opposite parties in considering his case for

promotion to the post of O.F.S. Class-II, with restrospective

effect by implementing the order dated 14.02.2012 passed in

O.A.No.997(C) of 2006 & O.A. No.2057(C) of 2004.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

for the State.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

has filed representation dated 19.03.2012 before the opposite

party No.1/The Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary to

Government, Fianance Deptt, Odisha under Annexure-4 but the

same is pending till date. It is further contended that the

petitioner ha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top