HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
S.K.PANIGRAHI, J
SHYAM SUNDAR PATNAIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent
WPC(OAPC)/299/2012
Page 1 of 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC(OAPC) No.299 of 2012
Shyam Sundar Patnaik
….
Petitioner
Mr.A.K.Mishra, Adv.
-versus-
State of Odisha & another
….
Opposite Parties
Mr.Y.S.P. Babu, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE S.K. PANIGRAHI
Order No.
ORDER
18.02.2022
02
1.This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2. By way of this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the
in-action of the opposite parties in considering his case for
promotion to the post of O.F.S. Class-II, with restrospective
effect by implementing the order dated 14.02.2012 passed in
O.A.No.997(C) of 2006 & O.A. No.2057(C) of 2004.
3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has filed representation dated 19.03.2012 before the opposite
party No.1/The Commissioner-cum-Principal Secretary to
Government, Fianance Deptt, Odisha under Annexure-4 but the
same is pending till date. It is further contended that the
petitioner has superannuated from his service.
// 2 //
Page 2 of 2
5. In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with a
direction that the petitioner shall file a fresh representation
before the opposite party No.1/The Commissioner-cum-
Principal Secretary to Government, Fianance Deptt, Odisha
within one month hence and the opposite party No.1 shall
dispose of the representation within a period of one month
thereafter from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
6. Issue urgent certified copy of the order as per Rules.
( S.K. Panigrahi)
Judge
LB