SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
PRAVAT CHANDRA MOHANTY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
WPC(OA)/487/2017



1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

WPC (OA) No. 487 of 2017

Pravat Chandra Mohanty

…..

Petitioner

Mr. P. Mohapatra, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha and others

…..

Opposite parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

24.08.2022

Order No.

01

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The Petitioner has filed this Writ Petition seeking direction to

the opposite parties to consider his grievance for appointment to the

post of J.S.C.A. treating him at par with his Juniors.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that

highlighting the grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to

Opposite Party No.2 vide Annexure-5 and the same may be directed to

be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the

State has no objection.

5.

As agreed to by learned Counsel for the parties, this Court,

without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of

the Writ Petition directing opposite party No.2 to consider the

representation filed by the Petitioner vide Annexure-5 and pass

appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of three

months from the date of production of certified copy this order.

6.

Issue urgent certified copy as per rules.

Arun

(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top