SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
KRUSHNA CHANDRA RATH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent


Advocates:
['ANIL KUMAR DAS', '', 'K MOHANTY', 'R ROUTRAY']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No. 36274 of 2021

Krushna Chandra Rath

&..

Petitioner

Mr.A.K. Das, Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha and others

&..

Opposite Parties

State Counsel

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI

ORDER

24.11.2021

Order No.

1

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Heard.

3.

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking

direction to the opposite parties for sanction and disbursement

of Grade Pay @ Rs.5400/- in 3rd RACP on completion of 30

years of service with effect from 13.03.2015 taking into

consideration the Panchayati Raj Department Notification dated

19.06.2014 and the judgment passed in the case of State of

Orissa and others Vrs. Biharilal Barik and others in W.P.(C)

No. 2831 of 2016 dated 27.06.2016.

4.

In course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner

states that the petitioner may be permitted to move a fresh

representation highlighting his grievances before the authority

so that the same can be considered in the light of the ratio

decided by this Court in State of Odisha and another v. Bihari

Lal and others (W.P.(C) No.2831 of 2016 disposed of on

27.06.201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top