HIGH COURT OF ORISSA
BAIJAYANTI ROUT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ODISHA – Respondent
CRLMC 3522/2022
Page 1 of 3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CRLMC No. 3522 of 2022
Baijayanti Rout & Others
&.
Petitioners
Mr. Akshaya Kumar Sahoo, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Orissa
&.
Opposite Party
Mr. S.S.Mohapatra, ASC
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER
30.11.2022
01.
1.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
counsel for the State.
2.
Prayer in the present case is to quash the impugned order
dated 29th January, 2022 passed by the learned S.D.J.M.,
Jagatsinghpur in G.R. Case No.1325 of 2021 arising out of
Jagatsinghpur P.S. Case No.611 of 2021 on the grounds stated
thereon.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that after the
FIR was lodged, Jagatsinghpur P.S. Case No.611 of 2021 was
registered under Sections 294, 323, 307, 379, 506 and 34 of IPC
and on completion of investigation, chargesheet has been filed
against the petitioners under Sections 294, 323, 506 and 34 IPC
excluding Section 307 IPC but then learned court below took
cognizance of the offences under Sections 294, 323, 506, 307 & 34
Page 2 of 3
IPC vide Annexure-3 which is currently under challenge. It is further
submitted that as per the chargesheet, a copy which is at Annexure-
2 series, the injuries sustained by the victim are found to be simple
in nature but then despite that learned court below took cognizance
of the offence under Section 307 IPC which is not tenable in law
and the same is liable to be interferred with, which is objected to by
Mr. Mohapatra, learned ASC for State on the ground that
notwithstanding such simple injuries, the victim was assaulted in the
manner which stand described in the FIR under Annexure-1 and that
makes out a case for the said offence.
4.
A copy of the FIR at Annexure-1 and the same is perused by
this Court. It is made to appear from Annexure-1 that the victim was
assaulted by fist and kick blows and also putting him down on the
floor and standing over his neck. Considering the circumstances and
the manner of assault and irrespective of the injuries received
though simple in nature, the Court is of the view that the offences
under Section 307 is prima facie made out considering the entirety
of the materials along with the chargesheet under Annexure-2 series.
5.
At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners submits
that since the petitioners were issued with Section 41-A Cr.P.C., in
the meantime, post-submission of chargesheet, NBWAs have been
issued which are pending execution and therefore, at least the
petitioners in the event the Court is not inclined to interfere with
the impugned order under Annexure-3 should direct them to
surrender and go on bail.
6.
Considering the limited prayer, this Court disposes of the
CRLMC with a direction to the petitioners to surrender before the
learned District and Sessions Judge, Jagatsinghpur on or before 20th
December, 2022 in G.R. Case No.1325 of 2021 arising out of
Jagatsinghpur P.S. Case No.611 of 2021 and move for bail and in
Page 3 of 3
such an event, learned court below shall release them on bail subject
to conditions. The petitioners are also granted liberty to raise all the
grounds as are available to them in law while seeking discharge and
any such application if so moved before the court below, learned
Sessions Court shall consider the same and pass appropriate order
thereon as per and in accordance with law.
7.
Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per rules.
(R.K. Pattanaik)
Judge
U.K.Sahoo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.