SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ORISSA HIGH COURT
TANMAYA KUMAR PATTNAIK – Appellant
Versus
BIBHU PRASAD SAHOO – Respondent


Advocates:
['SOUMYA MISHRA', '', 'E AGARWAL', 'B JENA', 'A AGARWAL', 'O PANDA', 'R K AGRAWAL']

Page 1 of 3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

CMP NO. 1299 OF 2022

Tanmay Kumar Pattnaik and others

....

Petitioners

Mr. Soumya Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

Bibhu Prasad Sahoo and others

&. Opp. Parties

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

20.12.2022

1. 1.

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2.

Order dated 21st May, 2022 (Annexure-9) passed by

learned Senior Civil Judge, Khurda in C.S. No.298 of 2011 is

under challenge in this CMP, whereby an application filed by

Defendant Nos.1 to 4 for impleation of list pendense purchasers

as parties to the suit has been allowed.

3.

Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioners submits

that the case is a chequered history. Earlier the Defendant-

Opposite Party No.1 was restrained from alienating the suit

property in an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2

C.P.C. in I.A. No.167 of 2011. The said order was challenged

unsuccessfully up to this Court in CMP No. 1255 of 2019.

Subsequently

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top