SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
COLONEL'S CENTRAL ACADEMY SCHOOL – Appellant
Versus
M/S TIGERS CRICEDU INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
ARB 215/2018



I N THE HI GH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDI GARH

Ar bi t r at i on Case No. 215 of 2018 ( O&M)

DATE OF DECI SI ON: 07. 09. 2018

Col onel ’ s Cent r al Academy School

…. . Appl i cant

ver sus

M/ s Ti ger s Cr i cedu I ndi a Pr i vat e Li mi t ed and anot her

. . . . . Respondent s

CORAM: - HON' BLE MR. JUSTI CE KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE

Pr esent :

Mr . Jai Vi r Yadav, Advocat e f or t he appl i cant

. .

KRI SHNA MURARI , CHI EF JUSTI CE( Or al ) :

Thi s i s an appl i cat i on

pur por t ed t o be

made under

sect i on 12( 3) ( a) r ead wi t h sect i on 15 of t he Ar bi t r at i on and

Conci l i at i on Act , 1996, f or change of Ar bi t r at or appoi nt ed vi de

or der dat ed 27. 01. 2017.

2.

Admi t t edl y, t he appl i cant made an appl i cat i on bef or e t he

Ar bi t r at or al l egi ng t hat si nce equal oppor t uni t y i s not bei ng

pr ovi ded same i s i n vi ol at i on of sect i on 18 of t he Act . The

Ar bi t r at or , vi de or der dat ed 12. 05. 2018, af t er consi der i ng t he

appl i cat i on, di d not r ecuse hi msel f and, t hus, t he appl i cat i on i s

deemed t o have been r ej ect ed.

3.

The gr ound on whi ch t he pr esent appl i cat i on has been

f i l ed, namel y, t he conduct of t he Ar bi t r at or , does not ent i t l e t he

appl i cant t o pr ay f or change or subst i t ut i on of Ar bi t r at or i n vi ew

of sect i on 34 of t he Act r ead wi t h sect i on 13( 3) . The same can

const i t ut e a gr ound f or chal l engi ng t he awar d af t er i t i s made and,

t hus,

t hi s

appl i cat i on,

i n

my

consi der ed

opi ni on,

i s

not

PARKASH CHAND

2018.09.10 14:24

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

ARB- 215- 2018

- 2 -

mai nt ai nabl e at al l and t he same accor di ngl y st ands di smi ssed

l eavi ng i t open t o t he appl i cant t o r ai se hi s obj ect i ons, i f at al l

any pr oceedi ngs ar e t aken by hi m under sect i on 34 of t he Act at any

subsequent st age.

( KRI SHNA MURARI )

07. 09. 2018

CHI EF JUSTI CE

par kash

NOTE:

Whet her speaki ng/ non- speaki ng: Speaki ng

Whet her r epor t abl e: YES/ NO

PARKASH CHAND

2018.09.10 14:24

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top