COCP-3153-2018

-1-

252

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

COCP-3153-2018

Date of decision: 20.08.2019

Ravinder Kumar Aggarwal and others

.. Petitioners

Versus

A.Venu Prasad and another

.. Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

Present:

Mr. Armaan Gagneja, Advocate for

Mr. Munish Gupta, Advocate

for the petitioners.

Mr. Vijay Kumar Kaushal, Advocate

for respondent No. 2.

****

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J. (

Oral

)

The present contempt petition has been filed alleging wilful

disobedience of the order dated 28.05.2018 passed by this Court in

CWP No. 13572 of 2018. The operative part of the order is reproduced

below:

“Accordingly, instant petition is disposed of with

direction to respondents to look into the grievance unfolded by

the petitioners in the legal notice dated 23.03.2018 (P-8) and

take a conscious decision, in the light of the service Rules and

Instructions issued by the Government dated March 14, 2017

(P-2), within a period of three months from the date of reciept

of a certified copy of this order.

However, in case, petitioners still feel aggrieved of the

order passed by concerned authority, they shall be at liberty to

have recourse to other remedies available under law including

to approach this Court.”

SHABHA

2019.08.26 10:26

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

COCP-3153-2018

-2-

Reply by way of affidavit of Ajoy Sharma, IAS, Chief

Executive Officer, PWSSB, along with order dated 17.05.2019 filed in

Court are taken on record. A copy of the same are handed over to learned

counsel for the petitioners.

Rs. 2,000/- , in cash as costs, is handed over to the petitioner.

This Court while disposing writ petition, itself, granted liberty

to have recourse to remedies available under law including to approach this

court.

Learned counsel for the petitioners states that he may be

permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition to avail the remedies in

accordance with law.

In view of the above, the contempt petition is dismissed as

withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. Rule issued against respondents is

discharged.

(AVNEESH JHINGAN)

20^th August, 2019

JUDGE

shabha

Whether speaking/reasoned

:

Yes/No

Whether reportable

:

Yes/No

SHABHA

2019.08.26 10:26

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document