SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
VARSHA GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
KAILASH RANI AND ORS – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No. 1328 of 2010

Date of Decision: October 08, 2010

Varsha Goyal

…Petitioner

Versus

Kailash Rani and others

… Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

1.

Whether reporters of local news papers may be

Allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. T.P.Singh, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Mr. Padam Jain, Advocate,

for respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

Alok Singh, J.

Plaintiff-petitioner has assailed the order dated

20.11.2009 passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Patiala, whereby additional issues were directed to be framed.

The brief facts of the present case are that plaintiff –

petitioner has filed suit for the following reliefs:-

C.R. No.1328 of 2010

Suit for declaration to the effect that the plaintiff is

the owner and in joint possession of the suit land

mentioned in Sub Paragraph A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H, along

with defendants No.1,3,4 & 5 in equal share and for

further declaration that the alleged “Will” dated

06.01.2005 registered vide Vasika No. 156 dated

06.01.2005 before Joint Su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top