HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
YASHVIR NIKHANJ AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
MANISH BINDAL – Respondent
CR 1480 OF 2011
1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND
HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
CR 1480 OF 2011
Date of decision: 3.5.2012
Yashvir Nikhanj and another
.. petitioner
vs
Manishh Bindal
... respondent
Present
Mr. Jai Shree Thakur, Advocate.
Mr. Alok Jain, Advocate.
M.M.S. BEDI,J.
The petitioners have preferred this petition under Article 227 of
the Constitution of India against orders Annexures P-6 and P-7 dated
9.2.2011 passed by the executing court dismissing the objection petition
and the stay application of the petitioners.
Brief facts, relevant for the adjudication of this revision petition,
are that the respondent had filed an execution application against the
petitioners before the Civil Judge (Sr.D) Gurgaon seeking to enforce an ex-
parte decree dated 23.3.2007 passed by the Court of Queen's Bench at
Alberta, Judicial District of Calgary, Canada. The petitioners filed objections
before the executing court on the ground that the execution petition is not
maintainable as the Canada is not a reciprocating territory within the
meaning of Section 44-A CPC. The respondent has not submitted certified
copy of the ex-parte decree, b
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.