CR No.165 of 2011(O&M)

#1#

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.165 of 2011(O&M)

Date of Decision:-14

th January 2013

Sunbeam Traders & Ors.

......Petitioners.

Versus

Smt. Urmil Rao.

......Respondent.

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

Present:-

Mr. B.S. Bedi, Advocate for Petitioners(tenants).

Mr. M.L. Sarin, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Himani Sarin, Advocate for respondent(landlord).

***

JASWANT SINGH, J.

Petitioners(tenants) are in revision under Section 18-A(8)of the

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949(hereinafter referred to as the

Act) against the impugned order dated 17.12.2010, passed by the learned

Rent Controller, Chandigarh, whereby, petition filed by respondent

(landlady) under Section 13-A of the Act, has been accepted and

consequently, application for leave to contest filed by the petitioners was

dismissed.

In brief, facts of the case are that respondent(landlady) claimed

herself to be owner of House no.224, Sector 16-A, Chandigarh (demised

premises), which she states to have purchased along with her husband and

two sons vide registered sale deed dated 30.03.2010. It was averred in the

CR No.