C.R. No. 2083 of 2011

[1]

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

C.R. No. 2083 of 2011

Date of Decision: January 18, 2012

Ram Phal

…..Petitioner

Vs.

Smt.Chandro and others

…..Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M.S. BEDI.

1.

Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to seek the

judgment?

2.

Whether to be referred to the Reporter?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

-.-

Present:-

Mr.S.S. Kharab, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Saurabh Bajaj, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr.S.S. Nara, Sr. DAG, Haryana.

-.-

M.M.S. BEDI, J. (ORAL)

Defendant has filed this revision petition under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India to impugn the order dated December 6, 2010

passed by Civil Judge, (Junior Division), Panipat, dismissing the suit of the

plaintiff- petitioner being not maintainable in view of the provisions of

C.R. No. 2083 of 2011

[2]

Order 23 Rule 3-A CPC while allowing the application of the defendant-

respondents objecting to the maintainability of the suit.

The brief facts which are relevant for the adjudication of the

present petition are that plaintiff- petitioner had filed a suit challenging the

consent decr