CR-1450-2017

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No. 1450 of 2017 (O&M)

Date of Decision: April 30, 2019

Rakesh Mahendru

..........PETITIONER

VERSUS

Gursharan Singh

........RESPONDENT

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER GUPTA

Present:

Mr. Vipin Mahajan, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr. G.S.Sirphikhi, Advocate

for the respondent.

*******

SURINDER GUPTA, J.(Oral)

Heard.

The landlord/respondent after seeking permission to amend the

rejoinder filed a fresh affidavit in his examination-in-chief, wherein he

incorporated the amended plea.

Learned counsel for the petitioner had initially argued that the

landlord/respondent was not competent to file fresh affidavit. However, he

has confined his submission to the extent that the subsequent affidavit filed

by the respondent be considered as supplementary affidavit only with regard

to the amendement allowed by the Court. The plea putforth by learned

counsel for the petitioner has not been contested by learned counsel for the

respondent.

In view of the above, this revision petition is disposed of with

observations that second affidavit filed by the respondent/landlord will be

JYOTI

2019.05.02 10:57

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

CR-1450-2017

2

deemed as supplementary affidavit only with regard to amendment

permitted to respondent/landlord to amend the rejoinder. It has been

submitted that the respondent/landlord has been partially cross examined by

the petitioner. Now, he will be further cross examined incontinuation of his

earlier cross examination by the petitioner and the Rent Controller will

ensure that this ejectment petition which was filed in the year 2011 is

disposed of at the earliest by giving short dates and if required by

continuing day to day hearing.

( SURINDER GUPTA )

April 30, 2019.

JUDGE

Jyoti-II

Whether speaking/reasoned:

Yes/No

Whether Reportable:

Yes/No

JYOTI

2019.05.02 10:57

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document