HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BHUPINDER SINGH AND ANR – Respondent
CR No. 1746 of 2012 (O&M) 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CR No. 1746 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of decision: 16.7.2012
Pal Singh
... Petitioner
versus
Bhupinder Singh and another
... Respondents
CORAM:
Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajan Gupta
Present:
Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)
Petitioner has impugned order dated 10.2.2012, annexure P-5,
passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), S.B.S. Nagar, whereby
application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC permitting the plaintiff to amend the
plaint was allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that
application for amendment has been moved after considerable delay. There
is nothing to show that despite exercise of due diligence, certain facts were
not in the knowledge of the plaintiff necessitating amendment of pleadings.
He has relied upon a judgment of apex court reported as 2012(1) RCR
(Civil) 903, J.Samuel and others vs. Gattu Mahesh and others.
I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.