SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
BHUPINDER SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


CR No. 1746 of 2012 (O&M) 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR No. 1746 of 2012 (O&M)

Date of decision: 16.7.2012

Pal Singh

... Petitioner

versus

Bhupinder Singh and another

... Respondents

CORAM:

Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajan Gupta

Present:

Mr.Sarju Puri, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Rajan Gupta, J. (Oral)

Petitioner has impugned order dated 10.2.2012, annexure P-5,

passed by Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), S.B.S. Nagar, whereby

application under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC permitting the plaintiff to amend the

plaint was allowed. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that

application for amendment has been moved after considerable delay. There

is nothing to show that despite exercise of due diligence, certain facts were

not in the knowledge of the plaintiff necessitating amendment of pleadings.

He has relied upon a judgment of apex court reported as 2012(1) RCR

(Civil) 903, J.Samuel and others vs. Gattu Mahesh and others.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top