SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJBIR KAUR AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
JEON SINGH AND ANOTHER – Respondent


CR No. 2345 of 2011 (O&M) -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No. 2345 of 2011 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 06.4.2011.

Rajbir Kaur and another

.......Petitioners

Vs.

Jeon Singh and another

......Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA

Present:

Mr. Sumeet Mahajan, Senior Advocate with

Mr. G.P.S.Bal, Advocate

for the petitioners.

.....

SABINA, J.

Plaintiff Jeewan Singh has filed a suit for declaration

that he was owner of the house in dispute. During the pendency

of the suit, an application was filed for brining on record legal

representatives of the deceased plaintiff. Vide order dated

10.2.2011, the evidence of the petitioners was closed on the

application for impleading the legal representatives of the

plaintiff. Hence, the present petition by the defendants.

Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted

that on the last date, fixed for evidence of the petitioners, they

could not conclude their evidence as father of the petitioner

Rajbir Kaur had died on 28.1.2011. Moreo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top