SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JIT SINGH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
SUKHDEV SINGH – Respondent


CR 2648/2014

108

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Date of decision:24/04/2014.

Jit Singh and another

.............Petitioners

v.

Sukhdev Singh

.............Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

Present:-

Mr.Atul Jain,Advocate for the petitioners

Jaswant Singh,J.(Oral)

Defendants/vendors are in revision aggrieved against the

order dated 3.1.2014 passed by the learned trial Court whereby the

application of the respondent/plaintiff under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC for

amendment of the plaint has been allowed.

It is not in dispute that there is an agreement to sell dated

16.2.2012 executed by the petitioners-owners for sale of 16 kanals of

land for a total sale consideration of Rs.20 lacs in favour of the

respondent-plaintiff. A sum of Rs.7.5 lacs was received as earnest

money. The target date for execution of sale deed was 15.5.2012 which

was mutually extended to 20.7.2012 and thereafter till 16.10.2012.

Respondent-plantiff filed a suit on 24.5.2013 for permanent injunction

seeking to restrain the petitioners-defendants from alienating,

transferring or otherwise creating a charge over the suit land. After

filing of the written statement by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top