SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SUMER SINGH @ SUMER CHAND AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SHER SINGH AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CIVIL REVISION No.2930 of 2015 (O&M)

DATE OF DECISION : 14.12.2021

Sumer Singh alias Sumer Chand and another

…..Petitioners

versus

Sher Singh and another

.....Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present :

Mr. R.S. Mamli, Advocate for the petitioners

Mr. Parminder Singh Advocate for the respondents

ALKA SARIN, J.:

Heard through video conferencing.

The present Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the

Constitution of India has been filed impugning the order dated 11.03.2015

(Annexure P-1) passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Karnal,

whereby the plaintiff-petitioners have been directed to affix ad valorem

court fee on the plaint. The said order has been passed on an application

filed by the defendant-respondents under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908.

PARKASH CHAND

2021.12.14 14:23

I attest to the accuracy of

this document

CR-2930-2015

- 2 -

The brief facts relevant to the present lis are that the plaintiff-

petitioners herein filed a suit for declaration with possession and

consequential relief of permanent injunction. It was averred in the plaint

that the plaintiff-petiti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top