SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
ARJINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT KAUR AND ANR – Respondent


CR No.2909 of 2014 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

CR No.2909 of 2014 (O&M)

Date of Decision: 23.07.2014

Arjinder Singh

..... Petitioner

Versus

Amarjit Kaur and another

... Respondents

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV NARAIN RAINA

Present:

Mr. Manish Prabhaker, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

1. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

RAJIV NARAIN RAINA, J.

Judicial record cannot be controverted except by way of an

affidavit presented before the same Judge. A story cannot be spun for the

first time in revisional jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India with a view to seek indulgence of this Court and expect it to

reconstruct what transpired in the trial court on a particular day of whether

the petitioner was present or not. The impugned order was passed on

November 12, 2013 and this petition has been filed rather belatedly and that

too without first approaching the trial Court for redress, if any. If the

petitioner has any genuine grievance against non-recording of his presence

in the order sheet on the date of hearing, complain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top