SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SURAJ BHAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
SHANTI DEVI AND ORS – Respondent


CR No.3348 of 2013 (O&M)

[ 1 ]

****

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR No.3348 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of decision:04.11.2014

Suraj Bhan and another

...Petitioners

Versus

Shanti Devi and others

...Respondents

CORAM:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar Jain

Present:

Mr. Sunil Chadha, Senior Advocate, with

Ms. Pallavi, Advocate, for the petitioners.

Mr. D.K.Tuteja, Advocate,

for the respondents.

*****

RAKESH KUMAR JAIN, J.

This petition is directed against the order dated 18.02.2013,

dismissing the application of the defendants for amendment of the written

statement.

In short, Bhagwan Dass, predecessor-in-interest of respondents

no.1 to 8 filed suit for permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from

dispossessing him from the suit property without adopting due course of

law. It was averred in para 2 of the plaint that the plaintiff Bhagwan Dass is

a tenant under the Shorgar Shamlat Panchayat’s land. In the written

statement filed through S.S.Kinha, Advocate, by the defendants, it was

alleged in reply to para 2 that the contents of para 2 are wrong and denied.

VINOD KUMAR

2014.11.13 11:05

I attest to the accuracy and

authen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top