SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
INDRESH GOEL AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
JAGDEV SINGH PANESAR – Respondent


C.R. No.3476 of 2015

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R. No.3476 of 2015

Date of Decision.20.05.2015

Indresh Goel and another

.......Petitioners

Versus

Jagdev Singh Panesar

......Respondent

Present:

Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate

for the petitioners.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

-.-

K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)

1.

The issue which is canvassed before this Court is whether a

person born outside India but who has Indian roots through his parents

can claim to be a NRI and apply the provisions under Section 13B of the

East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act. This point has been considered

by this Court in M/s Blue Sky Worldwide Travels and another Vs.

Harvinder Singh in C.R. No.2217 of 2015 dated 01.04.2015. I have held

and given reasons as to how acquisition of citizenship of a foreign

country will not make any difference if he is a person of Indian origin,

for, the definition of NRI does not spell out any bar for a non-citizen of

India to c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top