HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAVINDER KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
RAMPHAL AND ANR – Respondent
Civil Revision No. 3333 of 2012
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Revision No. 3333 of 2012 (O&M)
Date of decision : 29.5.2012
Ravinder
..... Petitioner
vs
Ramphal and another
..... Respondents
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bindal
Present:
Mr. Wazir Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Rajesh Bindal J.
Challenge in the present petition filed by defendant no. 2 in the
suit filed by respondent no. 1 is to the order dated 9.5.2012 passed by the
learned court below whereby the application filed by the plaintiff seeking to
implead the legal representatives of deceased Tek Chand, was allowed.
The proceedings in the present case arise out of a suit for
declaration filed by the plaintiff claiming himself to be the owner of the suit
land.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
application filed by the plaintiff could not be allowed by the learned court
below for the reason that the petitioner was the only legal representative of
deceased Tek Chand. He was adopted by him. He was the class-I heir,
whereas the legal representatives, who have now been impleaded are not the
class-I heirs, even if the averments made in the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.