SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PUNNA SINGH ETC – Appellant
Versus
PB.STATE – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.740-SB OF 1995

DATE OF DECISION: APRIL 23, 2007

Punna Singh and others

.....Appellants

VERSUS

State of Punjab

....Respondent

CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH

1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?

2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

PRESENT:

Mr. Kuldip Sanwal, Advocate,

for the appellants.

Mr. M. C. Berry, Sr.DAG, Punjab,

for the State.

*****

RANJIT SINGH, J.

Three appellants, namely, Punna Singh, Gurdial Singh and Darshan

Singh have filed this appeal against the order of their conviction for offences

under Sections 307, 326, 325, 323, 324, 34 IPC. Upon their conviction, the

appellants were sentenced as under:-

Name

SENTENCE

i. Gurdial Singh

7 years RI and fine of Rs.500/-.

In default of payment of fine, two

months further RI under Section

307 IPC.

-

2 years RI and to pay a fine of

Criminal Appeal No.740-SB of 1995 :{ 2 }:

Rs.200/-. In default of payment

of fine, to further undergo RI

for one month u/s 325/34 IPC.

-

1 year RI u/s 324/34 IPC.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top