HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
BUJA RAM – Appellant
Versus
TEK CHAND – Respondent
RSA No.1629 of 1981 (O&M)
1
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH
CM No.12021-C of 2004 and
RSA No.1629 of 1981
Date of Decision: 23.3.2010
Bhuja Ram (died) through LRs and others
...Appellants
Versus
Tek Chand and others
.....Respondents
1. Whether Reporter of local papers may be allowed to see the
judgment- Yes.
2.To be referred to the Reporters or not- Yes.
3. Whether judgment should be reported in the digest-Yes.
4.
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Singh
Present:
Mr. R.S. Mittal, Sr. Advocate with
Mr. Atul Gaur, Advocate
for the Appellant.
Mr. S.K. Garg Narwana, Advocate
for the respondent.
Mr. Alok Singh, J. (Oral)
1.
This application is moved under Section 151 CPC to
withdraw/oral statement dated 15.10.2010 of the learned counsel for
the appellant and for recalling the order, which was recorded by this
Court in the order dated 15.10.2003. Order dated 15.10.2003 reads
as under:-
“Counsel for the appellants states that he is
pressing this appeal qua respondents No.1 to
4, 8 to 13, 17 and 20 only. He gives up all the
other respondents as unnecessary. The appeal
is, accordingly, dismissed qua the other
RSA No.1629 of 1981 (O&M)
2
respondents.”
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.