SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
HUKAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
RAJINDER SINGH AND OTHERS – Respondent


C.r.No.4566 of 2004 [1]

THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.4566 of 2004

Date of Decision: 31 - 8 - 2006

Hukam Singh

........Petitioner

v.

Rajinder Singh and others

........Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.PATWALIA

***

Present:

Mr.Alok Jain, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr.Anil Rathee, Advocate

for respondent No.1.

Mr.C.B.Goel, Advocate

for respondent No.17.

Mr.Sudhir Aggarwal, Advocate

for respondent Nos.2,5,6 and 9 to 14.

***

P.S.PATWALIA, J.

The present revision petition has been filed challenging order dated

10.9.2004 vide which the learned trial Court dismissed an application seeking

amendment of the plaint.

The learned trial Court found that the proposed amendment was

totally contradictory to the version of the original plaint and if allowed would

amount to withdrawal of an admission. The Court further found that the original

averments were supported by a detailed site plan and the proposed amendment

relied on a totally different contradictory site plan and if allowed would amount to

changing documents attached with the plaint. It was f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top