Civil Revision No. 5075 of 2008

-1-

****

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No. 5075 of 2008

Date of decision : 12.1.2010

Pappu Cheema alias Bhupinder Singh

....Petitioner

Versus

Om Parkash

...Respondent

****

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. ANAND

Present: Mr.Arvind Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. R.K.Malik, Advocate for the respondent

S. D. ANAND, J.

The plaintiff-respondent had filed a suit for the recovery

of Rs.4,87,489/- (Rs.3,58,448/- as principal and Rs. 1,29,041/- as

interest thereupon at the rate of 12%) against the defendant-

petitioner. When the case was fixed for rebuttal evidence and

arguments, the plaintiff-respondent came forward with an application

under Order 18 Rule 17 of the C.P.C. to obtain the leave of the

Court to adduce additional evidence. That plea filed by the plaintiff-

respondent came be allowed by the learned Trial Court.

The defendant-petitioner is in revision against it.

In the course of the affirmative evidence, the plaintiff-

respondent had relied upon certain bahi entries which contain the

various dates on which dates amount had been paid to the