SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
AMRIK KAUR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
CHARANJIT KAUR AND ORS – Respondent


C.R. No.521 of 2009

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

C.R. No.521 of 2009

Date of decision:- 29.01.2009.

Amrik Kaur and another

...Petitioners.

Versus

Charanjit Kaur and others

...Respondents

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

Present:-

Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate

for the petitioners.

JASWANT SINGH J.

The petitioners-plaintiffs have filed the present revision petition

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order

dated 13.06.2007 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Amritsar and order dated 10.01.2009 (Annexure P-2) passed by learned Additional

District Judge, Amritsar vide which their application under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2

of CPC for interim injunction has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court and

affirmed by the learned first Appellate Court. The facts giving rise to the present

matter in controversy are as under:-

That one Darshan Singh, was the owner of the suit property and he

died in the year 1977 leaving behind two sons and three daughters namely:-

1.

Ravel Singh

son-respondent No.2-defendant

2.

Gurmej Singh

son (deceased) represented by Charanjit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top