SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SHARDA RANI AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR – Respondent


-1-

Civil Revision No.4132 of 2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.4132 of 2017

Date of decision: 03.07.2017

Sharda Rani and others

.......Petitioners

versus

Rajesh Kumar

......Respondent

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN

Present: -

Mr. Arjun Veer Sarma, Advocate, for the petitioners.

RAMENDRA JAIN, J. (ORAL)

Defendants have filed the instant revision petition under Article

227 of the Constitution of India for setting aside the impugned order dated

05.05.2017 (Annexure P-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division),

Ludhiana, dismissing their application filed under Section 151 CPC for

leading additional evidence. Prayer has been made to allow the petitioners

to lead additional evidence to prove electricity bills Ex. D-13 and Ex.D-14.

Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the

petitioners had applied for the electricity connection on 29.12.2014, after

more than one year of filing their written statement. Hence, at that time

aforesaid electricity bills (Ex. D-13 and Ex.D-14) were not in their

knowledge and possession. However, during their evidence, the petitioners

produced the aforesaid electric

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top