IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

CR No.441 of 2012 (O&M)

Date of decision: 10.12.2012

Zora Singh

... Petitioner

Versus

Bhagwan Singh and others

... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N.JINDAL

Present :

Mr.Arun Luthra, Advocate

for the petitioner.

Mr.Akash Singla, Advocate

for respondents No.1 to 6.

A.N.Jindal, J. (Oral)

This revision petition has arisen out of the orders dated

5.12.2011 and 17.12.2011 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge

(Sr.Divn.) Budhlada vide which the respondents-plaintiffs were allowed to

produce the document (Ex.CX) in rebuttal evidence.

I have gone through the judgments passed in case Pawan

Kumar Vs. Surinder Pal and another”, 2010(8) RCR (Civil), 1958,

“Wazirpur Small Industries Association (Regd.) Vs. Union of India and

others” 2010(4) AD (Delhi) 262 and “Kewal Singh Vs. Jagjit Singh”,

2007(4) RCR (Civil) 631 and “Gurbaksh Singh Vs. Jagat Singh and

others”, 1990(2) Crl.41 over which reliance has been placed by learned

counsel for the respondents in order to contend that the plaintiffs should be

given sufficient opportunity to lead evidence in rebuttal to prove his case

after defendants