SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
MAYA @ MAHA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
KRISHAN CHAND AND ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CIVIL REVISION NO.4495 OF 2012 (O&M)

DATE OF DECISION : 1

st AUGUST, 2012

Maya @ Maha Singh

…. Petitioner

Versus

Krishan Chand & another

…. Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE L. N. MITTAL

* * * *

Present :

Mr. Gaurav Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner.

* * * *

L. N. MITTAL, J. (ORAL)

CM No.18812-CII of 2012

Allowed as prayed for.

Main Case

Defendant-Maya @ Maha Singh by filing this revision petition

under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has challenged order dated

30.05.2012 Annexure P-1 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Senior

Division), Kaithal, thereby dismissing application Annexure P-5 moved by

defendant-petitioner for sending the impugned pronote and receipt to Central

Laboratory, Delhi to determine the age of ink of writing by pen and thumb

impressions.

CR No.4495 of 2012 (O&M)

- 2 -

Respondents/plaintiffs have filed suit against defendant/petitioner

vide plaint Annexure P-2 alleging inter alia that the defendant on 19.06.2008

took advance of `2,50,000/- from the plaintiffs and executed impugned

pronote and receipt for the same.

Stand of defendant in his written statement Annexure

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top