SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
YAD RAM AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
MANSHA RAM AND ANR – Respondent


C.R NO. 4927 OF 2011 (O&M)

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R NO. 4927 OF 2011 (O&M)

DECIDED ON : 04.01.2012

Yad Ram and others

...Petitioners

versus

Mansha Ram and others

...Respondents

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. C. PURI

Present :

Mr. Diwan S. Adlakha, Advocate.

K. C. PURI, J. (ORAL)

Challenge in this revision petition under Article 227 of

the Constitution of India is to order/judgment and decree dated

28.04.2011 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Yamuna

Nagar at Jagadhari.

Briefly stated, on 26.04.1995 Garibu, plaintiff, father

and grandfather of the petitioners filed a suit for declaration that

he is in exclusive possession of land measuring 86 Kanal 3 Marlas

situated at village Duamanwala,Tehsil Jagadhari,District Yamuna

Nagar and the decree dated 05.10.1991 obtained by the

defendant-respondent No.2 is null and void and inoperative qua

the rights of plaintiff. Garibu also sought relief of permanent

C.R NO. 4927 OF 2011 (O&M)

-2-

injunction restraining defendant No.2 from interfering in their

actual possession and also from changing the Khasra Girdawari

entries in his favour on the basis of impugned dec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top