1

l

414

P

RSAN0124

of 1985

1

ekKeekekek

IN THE HIGH

COURT

OF PUNJAB

AND HARYANA

AT

CHANDIGARH

e

RSA Noe2124of1985

Date 0fdecisi0n117e022011

Ram Singhandothers

lppellants

Versus

1

Mansa Singhand others

2esjondents

1

CORAM

HONBLE

MR

JUSTICE

RAKESH

KUMAR

JAIN

1

0

9

0

Presentl

Mr Alok ^{Jain Advocate}

for the

1

I

0

Mr ^{SantoshSharmaAdvocate}

I

for the

1

88888

Z

RAKESH

KUMAR

JAIN

J

tr

The defendants^are in secondappealagainstthejudgment

anddecree

r

1

of ^{the First} Appellate^Court by^which judgment

and decreeof 5e learnedTrial

I

Court

hasbeenreversed

3

Z

ln ^{brief the}plaintiffs^{filed a suit for declaration}alleging^theleinthat

they^{are the owners}

in possession

of thelandin disputebyvinue of ^an agreement

10

to sell dated05061971 enteredinto betweenthe partiesfor asum

of

57001

V7

which ^was paidthenandtherewith ^a stipulation

thatwhenevertheplaintiffs

would

Z

require^to getthe^sale deedregistered

they^{would havethe}option^{to do thesame}

n

It ^was allegedthat^no saledeedhasbeenregistered

so far butas theplaintiffs

are

Ill peacefulcontinuouspossession

of ^{the land} in dispute^{for more than 12 years}

with the

of the dcfendantstheyhze

become ^owners

by ^way of

1

4

adversepossessionIt ^was

also allegedthat the plaintiffshad rcquested

the

defendantsmany ^a times to getthesaledeedregistered

in their favour butthey

l

have been postponing

themattcr ^{on otle} pretcxt^or the other and Onallyrefusedto

el

admittheirclaim ^a week back

It is also averredthattheplaintiffs

have^come

to

b

4

know thatthedefendantshaveexecutedanotheragreement

to sellin respectofthe

land in disputein favourof otherpersonsandstartedinterfering

in theirpaceful

posscssion^{With theseassertions the} following^prayerwas

made in thesuit

7t is therefore

prayed^{that a decree}for ^{declarationto}

1

Batra Amit Sh.

Charanjit Batra

2012.05.16 00:25

True Scaned Copy

of Orignal

PHHC, Chandigarh

JOYTI RANI

2016.03.28 16:00

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

415

4

1

RSA Noe2124of 1985

e

1

ekskekekek

theeffectthattheplaintiHs

are the owners

of^theentire

1

suit land ^as

detailed above and ^as per copy of the

jamabandi

attachedherewithfor thefactsgivenabove

r

with pennanentinjunction^as

relief

the defendants^om gettingthe sale deed

of ^{the land} of ^{which the} plainti

are the

ownersin possession

and to get

thesale deed

to any otherpersonby

theplaintiffsfrom

0

thesuit land illegallyandforciblymaykindlybepassed

0

ln favourof theplaintiffsand againstthe defendants

A

with costs Anyother reliefwhichtheCourt deemsflt

C9

may^{also beawardedto the}plaintiffs

33

I

Jt may be pertinent

to mention that initiallythe suit was filed ^on

Z

211981

by ^Surain Singh^{but lateron aRer the death} of ^Surain Singh^an

application

was

moved ^on 1402983

for impleading

his legal

which ^were brought

on recordandthesuit was amendedHence theamendedsuit

I

wasfiled ^on 05031983 fromwhichthe prayermadein thesuithasbeenextracted

11

hereinabove While contesting

thesuit the defendantshaddeniedtheaverments 1

Z

madein the plaintmuclless the

agreement

and the amountof consideration^as

CO

by^theplaintiffs^Theplaintiffs

filed replication

and^on thepleadings

ofthe l

parties^{thelearnedTrial Courtframedthe}following

issuesl

W2

Z

1

WhethertheplaintiiT

zs

zn

of ^thesuit

land2OPP

2

Whether lhere is any valid agreementdated

05061971 ^as alleged90PP

1

4

3

If ^{issue No}

isprovedwhether the agreement

lS

void etc ^as allegedbythe

1

4

WhethertheplaintilThas becomethe

owner

by

tzd17erse

5

Whether the suit is

not maintainable in

the

presentform90PD

6onusobjectedto9

S

6

Whetherthe suit is barredoyprincipleof ^res

1

judicata20PD

7

I44zethertheplaintiffis estoppedbyhis own act

Batra Amit Sh.

Charanjit Batra

2012.05.16 00:25

True Scaned Copy

of Orignal

PHHC, Chandigarh

JOYTI RANI

2016.03.28 16:00

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

416

1

1

t

6

RSA No2124 0f1985

8

ekRekek

i

and

thesuit2OPD

8

Whethertheplaintihas ^no locus standito Iile

thesuit90PD

9

Whethertheplaintifhas now ^come

to the Court

withcleanhands ifso itsect90PD

Il

10

Whetherthesuit is timebaned2OPD

1

ll

Whetherthesuit is