SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAJIV GOEL – Appellant
Versus
SOHAN LAL AND ANR – Respondent


C.R.No.6063 of 2009 (O&M)

1

In the High Court for the States of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.

Decided on February 05,2010.

Rajiv Goel

-- Petitioner

vs.

Sohan Lal Khosla and another

--Respondents.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR JAIN

Present:

Mr.Arun Jindal,Advocate,for the petitioner

Ms. Naiya Gill,Advocate, for respondent No.1.

Mr.Neeraj Sharma,Advocate,for respondent No.2.

Rakesh Kumar Jain, J: (Oral)

This revision arises out of an order passed by learned Civil

Judge (Junior Division) Patiala dated 10.8.2009, vide which an application

filed under Order 1 Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for

short,'CPC') by the petitioner has been dismissed.

Brief facts of the case are that a suit for permanent injunction

has been filed by the plaintiff Sohan Lal Khosla against Municipal Council,

Sanaur, seeking to restrain it from interfering in his peaceful possession

over the private passage measuring 200 square yards purchased by him vide

sale deed dated 25.1.1999 and to take action in pursuance of notice dated

13.10.2005 issued by the defendants to remove obstruction from the private

C.R.No.6063 of 2009 (O&M

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top