SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
PARDEEP SINGH AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R. No.4852 of 2006

Date of Decision:- 16.05.2008

Pardeep Singh and another

....Petitioner(s)

through

Mr.V.B.Aggarwal, Advocate

vs.

State of Haryana and another

....Respondent(s)

through

Mr.R.S.Kundu, Addl.AG, Haryana.

***

CORAM:-HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.

***

1) Whether Reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment?

2) To be referred to the Reporters or not?

3) Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

***

SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)

This revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of

India is directed against the order dated 20.6.2005 passed by the Collector,

Kurukshetra whereby the petitioners have been directed to make good the

deficiency regarding affixation of stamp duty on the sale deed dated

16.5.2000, failing which the same shall be recovered as land revenue, as

well as against the order dated 31.1.2006 passed by the Commissioner,

Ambala Division, upholding the aforestated order of the Collector,

Kurukshetra.

The petitioners purchased agricultural land measuring 24

kanals 3 marlas for a sum of Rs.2,75,000/- from one Sanjay Kumar Dattak

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top