SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JAGDISH RAI – Appellant
Versus
GRAM PANCHAYAT ETC – Respondent


Civil Revision No.5433 of 2011

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.5433 of 2011

Date of Decision:06.09.2011

Jagdish Rai ......Petitioner

Versus

Gram Panchayat Village Khanal Khurd and others .....Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR.

Present:

Mr.Manish Kumar Singla, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

****

M

EHINDER

S

INGH

S

ULLAR

, J.(oral)

The contour of the facts, which requires to be noticed for the limited

purpose of deciding the core controversy, involved in the instant revision petition

and emanating from the record is that, Jagdish Rai son of Kesho Ram-petitioner-

plaintiff(for brevity “the plaintiff”) filed the suit for a decree of permanent

injunction, restraining the Gram Panchayat of Village Khanal Khurd, its Sarpanch

and Raj Kumar son of Janak Raj-respondent-defendants(for short “the

defendants”), from forcibly interfering in his possession and to change the nature

of the property in dispute.

2.

The case set-up by the plaintiff, in brief, insofar as relevant was that,

he is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top