SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
NIRMAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
PRAHLAD SINGH – Respondent


CR No.5518 of 2015

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR No.5518 of 2015

Date of decision: 27.08.2015

Nirmal Singh

... Petitioner

Vs.

Prahlad Singh

... Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to

see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:-

Mr. Sunny K.Singla, Advocate

for the petitioner.

AMIT RAWAL

J. (Oral)

Challenge in the present petition is to the impugned order

dated

25.05.2015

(Annexure

P-5),

whereby,

the

objections/application under Section 30 of Punjab Relief of

Indebtedness Act, 1934 read with Section 151 CPC filed by the

judgment debtor, has been dismissed.

Mr. Sunny K. Singla, learned counsel appearing on behalf

of the petitioner/judgment debtor submits that trial Court decreed the

suit and the respondent-plaintiff was held entitled to recover the

amount of `1,50,000/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the

date of execution of the pronote, i.e, 09.04.1997 till realization. He

further submits that as per Section 30 of the aforementioned Act, the

Court cannot pass,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top