C.R. No.564 of 2016

-1-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R. No.564 of 2016

Date of Decision.29.01.2016

Roshan Lal

.......Petitioner

Vs.

Ram Asra Mal now deceased through LRs ........Respondent

Present:

Mr. Vineet Chaudhary, Advocate

for the petitioner.

CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN

1.

Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the

judgment ?

2.

To be referred to the Reporters or not ?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

-.-

K. KANNAN J. (ORAL)

1.

A needless overdoing of job by plaintiff is what is the cause

of revision petition now. In a suit for specific performance of alleged

oral agreement of sale by the 1^st defendant, the plaintiff wanted to

bring an evidence after plaintiff's side was closed and after the

defendants had also given the evidence that the sale of stamp paper

contained the signature of first defendant who has since died and the

signature shall be proved as that of 1^st defendant. Under normal

circumstance I would have left it to the best intentions of the plaintiff

to secure whatever evidence was possible. In this case, since th