SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
STATE OF HARYANA – Appellant
Versus
PARMANAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COAURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

R.S.A.No.1947 of 2002

Date of Decision : 04.03.2008.

1. State of Haryana through Secretary Deptment of Forest of

Wild Life, Chandigarh.

2. Collector, Panchkula.

....Appellants.

Versus

Parmanand son of Shri Uday Ram, resident of village Chaila,

Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula.

....Respondent

****

Present: Mr.L.aR.Nanda, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana,

for the appellants.

Sh.Bhag Singh, Advocate, for respondent.

Rakesh Kumar Jain (J)

This appeal has been brought by the defendants

against the judgment decree of Lower Appellate Court dated

31.01.2002, who had modified the decree of Trial Court and

awarded Rs.1,00,000/- as compensation for the death of Mohan

Lal, alongwith interest @ 9% per annum from the date of decree

R.S.A.No.1947 of 2002

-2-

of the Trial Court till the date of realization.

Shorn of unnecessary details, the brief facts of the

case are that Mohan Lal, son of the plaintiff, was a student of 7th

class and was studying in a school at Morni. On 10.08.1989,

while he was going to his school alongwith his cousin Yad Ram

on a public passage, they were attacked by a leopard who

carried away both Mo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top