SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
JANAK RAJ – Appellant
Versus
M/S DES RAJ CHANDER SHEKHAR AND ORS – Respondent


CR No.5807 of 2014 (O&M)

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

CR No.5807 of 2014 (O&M)

Date of decision: 14.09.2015

Janak Raj

... Petitioner

Vs.

M/s Des Raj Chander Shekhar,

Commissioner Agents, Jalalabad & others

... Respondents

CR No.5817 of 2014 (O&M)

Janak Raj

... Petitioner

Vs.

Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. & others

... Respondents

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL

1.

Whether reporters of local newspapers may be allowed to

see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:-

Mr. Sandeep Jasuja, Advocate

for the petitioner (in both cases).

Mr. Neeraj Madan, Advocate

for respondent No.1.

Mr. R.L. Sharma, Advocate

for respondent No.2 (in both cases).

AMIT RAWAL

J. (Oral)

This order of mine shall dispose of two revision petitions

bearing Nos.5807 and 5817 of 2014.

Challenge in the present petitions is to the impugned

SAVITA DEVI KADIAN

2015.09.21 13:57

I attest to the accuracy and

integrity of this document

High Court Chandigarh

CR No.5807 of 2014 (O&M)

2

order dated 13.08.2014 (Annexure P-7), whereby, the application

under Order 21 Rule 37 CPC, filed by the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top