IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

Civil Revision No.6185 of 2017 (O&M)

DATE OF DECISION : 26.04.2022

Nirmal Singh

…..Petitioner

versus

Municipal Corporation, Jalandhar and Others

.....Respondents

CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ALKA SARIN

Present :

Mr. M.L. Saggar, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Tejeshwar Singh Sullar, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. Tarun Seth, Advocate for

Mr. Sumit Jain, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2

Mr. Ashish Grover, Advocate for respondent No.3

..

ALKA SARIN, J.:

The present revision petition has been filed under Article 227

of the Constitution of India impugning the order dated 28.08.2017 passed

by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Jalandhar whereby the

plaintiff-petitioner has been directed to cross-examine the witness DW-

Vinod Kumar at the first instance and thereafter the learned counsel for

defendant-respondent No.3 would have the right to cross-examine the said

witness.

The learned counsel for the plaintiff-petitioner would contend

that the entire case as set up by the plaintiff-petitioner is that there has been

PARKASH CHAND

2022.04.26 14:37

I attest to the accuracy and

authenticity of this document

CR No.6185 of 201