SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SHASHI DHAWAN – Appellant
Versus
S.M. KHAN & ANR – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH

C.R. No. 7509 of 2010 (O&M)

Date of Decision: November 18, 2010

Shashi Dhawan.

…Petitioner

Versus

S.M. Khan and another.

… Respondents

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH

1.

Whether reporters of local news papers may be

Allowed to see judgment?

2.

To be referred to reporters or not?

3.

Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Present:

Mr. A.S. Chandhiok, Senior Advocate with

Ms. Vibha Dhawan, Advocate,

for the petitioner.

Alok Singh, J. (Oral)

Defendant-petitioner has invoked supervisory

jurisdiction of this Court, challenging the order dated

28.09.2010 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division),

Panchkula, thereby rejecting the application moved by

defendant no.1-petitioner herein under Order 7 Rule 11 C.P.C.

The brief facts of the present case are that plaintiff-

respondent no.1 has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory

injunction restraining the defendant from alienating/disposing

off the suit property to any other person except the plaintiff

C.R. No. 7509 of 2010

and for mandatory injunction directing defendant no.1 to

complete the sale in favour of the plaint

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top