SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
SATINDER SINGH VIRDI – Appellant
Versus
VIKAS THAKUR – Respondent


CR No.667 of 2013 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT

CHANDIGARH.

Civil Revision No.667 of 2013 (O&M)

Date of decision: 19.2.2013

Satinder Singh Virdi

...Petitioner

Versus

Vikas Thakur

...Respondent

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA

Present: Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Rajan Gupta, J.

Present revision petition is directed against the order dated

18.11.2012 passed by the court below rejecting application filed by the

plaintiff for decreeing the suit in view of admission made by the

defendant.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that defendant

stated before the court that he had no objection in case suit of the plaintiff

was decreed. Trial court, thus, gravely erred in rejecting the application.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and given

careful thought to the facts of the case.

Plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction to restrain

defendant and his agents from alienating or transferring 1/3rd share out of

suit property to any one else except plaintiff. Written statement was filed

by the defendant admitting the claim of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top