SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
RAM DAYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent
/285/2020



IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA

AT CHANDIGARH

201+270

DECIDED ON:12th May, 2022

(1)

CRR No. 2807 of 2019 (O&M)

Sunil Kumar and another

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana and another

.....RESPONDENTS

(2)

CRR No. 290 of 2020 (O&M)

Vinod Kumar .....PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana

.....RESPONDENT

(3)

CRR No. 285 of 2020 (O&M)

Ram Dayal

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana

.....RESPONDENT

(4)

CRM-M-14100-2015 (O&M)

Rajesh Kumar and others

.....PETITIONER

VERSUS

State of Haryana

.....RESPONDENT

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN.

Present:

Mr. Nishant Arora, Advocate for

Mr. Gaurav Mohunta, Advocate for petitioners.

Mr. Gurmeet Singh, AAG Haryana.

***

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL)

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no cause of action

survives for pursuing these petitions as the petitioners have been convicted on

23.2.2022.

Disposed of as infructuous

Since the main case has been decided, the pending application, if

any is rendered infructuous.

REEMA SAINI

2022.05.12 17:31

I attest to the accuracy and

authencity of this document

High Court, Chandigarh

201+270

-2-

Photocopy of this order be placed on the files of connected cases.

(AVNEESH JHINGAN)

12th May, 2022

JUDGE

reema

Whether speaking/reasoned

Yes/No

Whether reportable

Yes/No

REEMA SAINI

2022.05.12 17:31

I attest to the accuracy and

authencity of this document

High Court, Chandigarh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top